no cortisol/prolactin changes at GH-effective concentrations Jimenez-Reina et al
Core differences: For visceral fat specifically, tesamorelin has the strongest case
For cardiovascular health specifically, Canadians have well-established conventional options through the healthcare system
Why this matters: Tirzepatide alone already very powerful (15-22%) May already be optimizing GIP/GLP-1 pathways maximally Adding amylin might only add 2-5% more weight loss But could significantly increase side effects Risk-benefit ratio unknown Contrast with CagriSema: CagriSema: Extensively studied, Phase 3 trials, known safety Tirzepatide + cagrilintide: Zero studies, no safety data, speculative Learn about evidence-based approaches at SeekPeptides - explore best peptides for weight loss and best peptide stack for weight loss
Introducing Cost per Unit of Effectively Delivered GSH. To make a fair cost comparison, we need to introduce the concept of cost per unit of effectively delivered GSH
What should you aim for in terms of fiber